When Pakistan Tried to Redraw Borders: The Battles of Kargil and Siachen

When Pakistan Tried to Redraw Borders: The Battles of Kargil and Siachen

For decades, the icy heights of the Himalayas and the rugged cliffs of Kashmir have stood as silent witnesses to one of South Asia's most intense and dangerous rivalries. Among the most audacious episodes in this saga were Pakistan’s attempts to alter the Line of Control (LoC) — not through diplomacy, but through military incursions. Two flashpoints stand out vividly: the Siachen conflict and the Kargil War.

The Siachen Standoff: The Battle for the Frozen Frontier

In 1984, Pakistan set its sights on Siachen, the world’s highest and most inhospitable battlefield. Based on the ambiguity left in the 1949 Karachi Agreement and the 1972 Simla Agreement, Pakistan assumed it could claim control over the Siachen Glacier by occupying key ridges.

However, India, acting on intelligence inputs, launched Operation Meghdoot in April 1984. Preempting Pakistani moves, Indian troops captured the crucial Saltoro Ridge overlooking the glacier.

Pakistan, stunned by India’s rapid occupation, launched repeated assaults to dislodge Indian forces but failed miserably. Over time, despite the harsh climate killing more soldiers than bullets, India strengthened its grip on Siachen.
The Siachen conflict exposed Pakistan’s strategy: quietly altering the status quo on the ground to create a "new normal" in territorial control.

The Kargil Betrayal: A High-Altitude Gamble

Fast forward to 1999, and history repeated itself — this time at Kargil.
Under the leadership of General Pervez Musharraf, Pakistani military and paramilitary forces infiltrated into Indian territory across the LoC in the Kargil sector of Jammu and Kashmir during the winter months, exploiting the thinning Indian presence in high-altitude posts.

Disguised as militants, Pakistani soldiers occupied key peaks and ridges, cutting off India's access to the crucial Leh-Srinagar highway. Their plan was simple yet dangerously provocative:

• Sever Indian supply lines to Siachen.
• Internationalize the Kashmir issue by presenting it as a local uprising.
• Force India into negotiating from a position of weakness.

But the gamble backfired spectacularly.

When Indian patrols detected the intrusions in May 1999, the response was swift and ferocious. In what came to be known as the Kargil War, the Indian Army launched Operation Vijay, reclaiming almost all occupied positions after brutal, close-quarter battles fought at altitudes above 16,000 feet.

India’s decisive military response, coupled with international diplomatic pressure — especially from the United States — forced Pakistan to withdraw. The world recognized the Kargil incursion for what it was: a blatant breach of the Line of Control by Pakistan’s regular forces.

Pakistan's Strategy: Death by a Thousand Cuts

Both Siachen and Kargil exposed Pakistan’s long-standing strategy in Kashmir — low-cost, high-impact military adventures intended to change facts on the ground without triggering a full-scale war.

However, these misadventures came at a heavy price:

• At Siachen, Pakistan lost strategic advantages and exhausted resources fighting a losing battle.
• At Kargil, Pakistan faced global isolation, economic penalties, and a crushing blow to its military reputation.

Moreover, Kargil deeply strained Pakistan’s civilian leadership. Then-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, reportedly kept in the dark about the operation, found himself cornered internationally and domestically, eventually losing power to a military coup led by General Musharraf himself.

Lessons of Kargil and Siachen


The battles of Siachen and Kargil stand as stark reminders that border realignments, attempted through deception and force, do not endure.
Instead, they have hardened India's resolve, strengthened its military readiness along the LoC, and reaffirmed the international community’s support for the sanctity of established boundaries.

Pakistan’s repeated attempts to redraw the Line of Control through stealth and aggression ultimately deepened the distrust between the two nuclear-armed neighbors — a rift that continues to define the geopolitics of South Asia today.

The comments posted here are not from Cnews Live. Kindly refrain from using derogatory, personal, or obscene words in your comments.