Ottawa: In a bold and provocative move, prominent Khalistan separatist leaders have directly challenged India’s National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval, escalating tensions between pro-Khalistan activists abroad and Indian authorities. The challenge comes in the wake of the release on bail of Inderjeet Singh Gosal, a key figure associated with the banned organization Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), in Canada.
Gosal, who was arrested in Ontario during a traffic stop on September 19, was released on bail within a week, drawing sharp criticism from Indian officials. He has publicly reaffirmed his commitment to SFJ’s agenda, calling for the organization’s planned Khalistan referendum in India on November 23, 2025. In his statements, Gosal asserted that Delhi would become the center of a future Khalistan, signaling a renewed push for separatist activities on Indian soil.
The challenge was further amplified by SFJ leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, who released a video directly taunting NSA Ajit Doval. Pannun dared Indian authorities to attempt his arrest or extradition in Canada, the United States, or any European country, in a direct affront to India’s sovereignty and security framework. These actions underscore the audacity of transnational separatist movements and the complexities involved in countering them across international jurisdictions.
The situation also highlights ongoing diplomatic pressures between India and Canada. New Delhi has repeatedly urged Ottawa to take decisive action against Khalistani elements operating within Canadian territory. India emphasizes that coordinated international counterterrorism efforts are essential to curb the activities of extremist groups that threaten its national security.
As the date for the proposed referendum draws closer, the standoff is likely to prompt intensified diplomatic discussions. Indian authorities are expected to strategize on both legal and intelligence fronts to address the provocations by Gosal and Pannun, while Canadian officials navigate the delicate balance between domestic law, freedom of expression, and counterterrorism obligations.
This development has reignited debates over the influence of diaspora support for the Khalistan movement and its implications for India’s internal security. Analysts note that such confrontations not only test international cooperation but also challenge India’s ability to safeguard its sovereignty in the face of transnational separatist activism.