Washington: Donald Trump has strongly criticized the Supreme Court after it blocked his emergency tariff program, and he warned that the United States could impose new tariffs and licensing fees using other legal powers.
The court ruled that the administration exceeded its authority by introducing sweeping tariffs under emergency economic powers. The decision invalidated many of the trade duties imposed during Trump’s second term and reinforced Congress’s role in approving such measures.
In response, Trump cautioned trading partners not to withdraw from recently negotiated agreements with the United States. He said countries that attempt to take advantage of the ruling could face much higher duties under different trade laws. He also suggested that the government could introduce licensing fees on imports, a move that would add new costs for foreign exporters.
Despite the ruling, Trump insisted that several existing tariffs remain valid and could still be used more aggressively to protect American industries.
Following the court decision, the administration is exploring alternative legal tools to maintain trade pressure. Trump has already announced a temporary global tariff increase from 10 percent to 15 percent under Section 122 of U.S. trade law, which allows such measures for up to 150 days without congressional approval.
Officials are also considering tariffs under national security provisions, potentially targeting sectors such as batteries, industrial materials, chemicals and telecommunications equipment.
The ruling and the threat of new tariffs have created uncertainty in global markets and among U.S. allies, who are seeking clarity on future trade policy. Economists warn that prolonged uncertainty could disrupt supply chains and affect economic stability worldwide.
The dispute highlights growing tensions between the executive branch and the judiciary, while legal experts say the ruling places clearer limits on the use of emergency powers in trade policy.