Hamas's proposed ceasefire terms have been met with outright rejection from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who asserts the possibility of achieving "total victory" in Gaza within months. Following Hamas's presentation of demands in response to an Israel-backed ceasefire proposal, Netanyahu denounced negotiations with the group as futile, labeling their terms as "bizarre." Talks persist to seek a resolution amid escalating tensions.

Netanyahu emphasized during a press conference that only "complete and final victory" could resolve the conflict, warning of inevitable future clashes if Hamas remains in power in Gaza. The Israeli leader's staunch refusal underscores the deep-rooted discord between the parties, with Israeli officials deeming Hamas's attempt to dictate terms as unacceptable.

In contrast, a senior Hamas official dismissed Netanyahu's remarks as "political bravado," suggesting an intent to perpetuate the conflict. Despite this standoff, new rounds of negotiations, facilitated by Egypt and Qatar, are slated to resume in Cairo. Egypt has urged flexibility from all parties to achieve a ceasefire agreement.

Hamas's counter-offer, outlined in a document, proposes a phased ceasefire plan involving the exchange of hostages and prisoners, withdrawal of Israeli forces, and humanitarian aid escalation. However, Netanyahu's dismissal of this plan signals a significant setback to ongoing diplomatic efforts.

The situation intensifies with Netanyahu's announcement of Israeli forces preparing for potential operations in Rafah, raising concerns of exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in the city. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned of a dire situation should conflict spread to Rafah, where displaced Palestinians face dire conditions.

The rejection of Hamas's terms poses a challenge to the US-led efforts to broker a ceasefire, despite Secretary of State Antony Blinken's optimism about finding common ground. The plight of hostages adds urgency to the situation, with families expressing dismay over the potential consequences of Netanyahu's stance.

Furthermore, Netanyahu's vision for Gaza's future, emphasizing Israeli security control and disconnection from Hamas, contrasts with Washington's support for a Palestinian state. The discord between US and Israeli objectives complicates the path to a resolution, leaving the fate of Gaza uncertain.

As negotiations continue, the pressing question remains whether a compromise can be reached to alleviate the humanitarian crisis and pave the way for lasting peace in the region.