Antananarivo: A wave of youth led protests is sweeping across several countries, drawing attention not only to grievances over governance and inequality but also to the controversial methods some activists have employed. From Madagascar and Nepal to Peru and Morocco, the unrest reflects deep frustration among Generation Z, but in several cases, the movements have sparked violence and instability.

In Madagascar, protests against rising living costs and government mismanagement escalated into widespread unrest. The situation took a dramatic turn when the military intervened on October 14, removing President Andry Rajoelina and suspending the constitution. While young activists initially welcomed the move, supporting a military takeover raises questions about the commitment of these movements to democratic principles and civilian governance.

In Nepal, protests erupted in early September after the government blocked social media platforms. Demonstrators, mostly teenagers and young adults, stormed government offices, burned vehicles, and clashed with security forces. The unrest led to the resignation of Prime Minister K. P. Sharma Oli. Although the protests were driven by demands for access and reform, the violent tactics caused significant damage and posed risks to public safety.

In Peru, clashes between protesters and security forces left one person dead and over one hundred injured. The protests began after José Jerí assumed the presidency on October 10, with young people questioning his legitimacy. While the demonstrators sought political accountability, the resulting violence highlights the destructive side of these movements.

In Morocco, youth protests over unemployment, rising prices, and government spending on major events such as the 2030 FIFA World Cup have generally been peaceful. However, authorities have occasionally intervened with force, underscoring the tension between citizen activism and public order.

Analysts note that while Generation Z activists often aim to challenge corruption and inequality, their methods can blur the line between advocacy and disruption. Riots, property damage, and support for military intervention suggest that not all actions are constructive, and in some cases, the protests may exacerbate instability rather than promote lasting reform.

These movements reflect the impatience and frustration of a generation seeking change, but their mixed motives and violent tactics underscore the risks involved. The challenge for governments and societies is to address legitimate grievances while curbing destructive methods that threaten public safety and democratic norms.