Brussels: The European Union should consider deploying its military trainers directly into Ukraine as part of future security guarantees for Kyiv, the EU’s highest-ranking military official has said. Sean Clancy, Chair of the EU Military Committee, told Reuters that embedding EU trainers within Ukraine could strengthen the country’s post-war defense capabilities and enhance European security in the long term.
Currently, the EU Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine) has trained more than 80,000 Ukrainian soldiers outside the country. Clancy noted that transitioning part of this mission into Ukrainian territory would be “optimal” for both capacity-building and deterrence. He explained that such a presence would help Kyiv rapidly rebuild its armed forces after the conflict and act as a tangible assurance for Europe against ongoing Russian aggression.
The proposal is part of a broader EU strategy to strengthen Europe’s own defense capabilities by 2030 while maintaining strong security ties with NATO and the United States. Clancy highlighted that Europe continues to rely on U.S.-made systems such as Patriot missiles and F 35 fighter jets, and that Washington’s support will remain critical. Nevertheless, embedding trainers in Ukraine would signal Europe’s growing readiness to take a more direct role in continental security.
While the idea enjoys broad support across EU member states, no formal decision has yet been made. Any deployment will depend on a future peace agreement or ceasefire in Ukraine and must be carefully coordinated with Kyiv to respect its sovereignty and operational requirements. The number and scope of trainers will be determined based on Ukraine’s evolving needs and the level of consensus among the 27 EU countries.
If realized, this shift would mark a significant evolution in EU-Ukraine defense cooperation from training abroad to direct, embedded support within Ukraine. For Kyiv, it would represent a deeper commitment from the West, extending beyond weapons supplies to active participation in rebuilding and safeguarding its forces. For the EU, it would demonstrate a tangible step toward strategic autonomy, reinforcing European security while continuing to collaborate with transatlantic partners.
Deploying EU trainers into Ukraine carries inherent risks. It could escalate tensions with Russia, complicate peace negotiations, and expose EU personnel to battlefield hazards. Political consensus among EU capitals will be essential, as will close coordination with Ukrainian authorities to respect national sovereignty. Additionally, balancing this initiative with Europe’s broader goal of defense self-reliance by 2030 presents both logistical and strategic challenges.
The proposal underscores Europe’s commitment to supporting Ukraine while simultaneously signaling its intent to take a more active, independent role in continental defense. Decisions on the deployment of EU military trainers will likely unfold in parallel with diplomatic efforts to stabilize the region and prepare Europe for future security challenges.