Seoul : South Korea continues to deal with the political and legal fallout one year after former president Yoon Suk Yeol attempted to impose martial law, a move that many leaders and analysts describe as one of the most serious threats to the country’s democracy in decades.
The crisis began on December 3 last year when Yoon declared martial law and deployed troops toward the National Assembly. He said he was acting to stop what he described as anti state activities by political opponents. Members of parliament rushed into the building and blocked entrances while police and military units gathered outside.
The martial law lasted only a few hours before it was withdrawn. The sudden decision triggered nationwide anger, protests and immediate calls for accountability. Within days the opposition led parliament approved an impeachment motion against the president by a large majority.
Yoon’s presidential powers were suspended and Prime Minister Han Duck Soo temporarily took over as acting leader. In April the Constitutional Court confirmed the impeachment ruling and officially removed Yoon from office. Under South Korean law a presidential election was required and held in June.
Lee Jae Myung won the snap election and became the new president. Since taking office he has said restoring public trust and preventing future abuses of presidential power are among his main priorities.
Legal action also followed the political process. Yoon was arrested earlier this year and later released after a court canceled his detention warrant. He continues to face charges including insurrection which is among the most serious crimes in the country. Several of his former senior officials including military and government leaders also face trial for their involvement in the attempted martial law plan.
New reports from government officials show that investigations are still active and more legal decisions are expected in the coming months. President Lee recently said the country is still healing from the events and added that accountability is necessary so that similar attempts cannot happen again.
The crisis has affected South Koreas political environment and public opinion. Analysts say the case has reminded citizens of the importance of institutions balancing power and protecting democracy.
As the legal process moves forward many South Koreans hope the outcome will bring stability and long term reforms to prevent another national crisis.