Brisbane: Former international cricket umpire Steve Bucknor has admitted regret over a disputed decision he gave against Indian batting legend Sachin Tendulkar more than two decades ago, acknowledging that mistakes are part of the game.
Bucknor, who officiated at the highest level of cricket for many years, said the decision still stays with him and reflects the human side of umpiring. He explained that in the era before advanced technology, umpires had to rely entirely on their judgment in real time.
The dismissal most often linked to his regret occurred during India’s 2003 Test match against Australia at the Gabba in Brisbane. Tendulkar was ruled leg before wicket, but later analysis indicated the ball would likely have passed over the stumps. The decision sparked debate among fans and analysts and remains one of the most discussed umpiring calls involving the Indian great.
Bucknor has also previously acknowledged another controversial moment in 2005 at Eden Gardens during a Test match between India and Pakistan, when Tendulkar was given out caught behind despite replays suggesting the ball had not touched his bat.
These incidents became emotionally charged for Indian supporters because Tendulkar was the backbone of the batting lineup and his dismissals often had a major impact on the outcome of matches. The controversies also strengthened calls for technological assistance in decision making.
Since then, cricket has adopted tools such as the Decision Review System, which allows teams to challenge umpiring calls and use ball tracking and replay technology to improve accuracy. Bucknor himself has recognized that such systems reduce pressure on officials and help correct errors.
Despite the controversies, Bucknor remains one of cricket’s most experienced umpires, having officiated in more than 120 Test matches and several World Cups before retiring in 2009. His recent reflection has revived discussion among fans about iconic moments in cricket history and how the sport has evolved to ensure fairer outcomes.
His comments serve as a reminder that even at the highest level, human judgment can falter, and that the game continues to learn and improve from its past.